U.S. complaints about protectionist Canadian dairy policy hypocritical, report argues

The U.S. is in no place to lecture Canada on protectionist dairy coverage in keeping with a brand new report.

“In worldwide relations, the pot can name the kettle black — however doing so doesn’t construct belief, goodwill, or alliances, and weakens credibility,” stated Al Mussell, Agri-Meals Financial Programs’ analysis lead and writer of the coverage paper.

Regardless of criticisms of Canadian dairy coverage, the American dairy business has lots of the similar protectionist tendencies Canada does, Mussell argued in Throwing Stones from a Glass Home: Understanding the US Narrative on Canada Dairy Coverage.

Dryness reduces Australian wheat output says USDA attaché

With dry conditions in Australia’s southern production regions, the United States Department of Agriculture attaché in Canberra projected reduced wheat production for 2025/26. The attaché wrote in their report released on July 28 that Western Australia, South Australia and Victoria had low soil moisture levels going into wheat planting and there was below-average autumn rains.

Complaints from the business, President

Earlier this month, U.S. President Donald Trump wrote an open letter by which he accused Canada of charging “extraordinary Tariffs to (American) Dairy Farmers — as much as 400%.”

This determine has been disputed, although Canada’s dairy tariffs are over 200 per cent.

Not too long ago members of the Nationwide Milk Producers Federation within the U.S. advised the U.S. Worldwide Commerce Fee that Canada was undermining American dairy producers’ entry to overseas markets with “artificially low-priced exports.”

Regardless of the frequent American complaints, “there are lots of similarities in dairy and commerce insurance policies between the U.S. and Canada,” Mussell stated in a information launch.

Programs in contrast

These coverage parallels embrace pricing milk collected from farms in end-use lessons and “obstacles to imports that facilitate the working of their respective milk advertising and marketing methods,” the paper stated.

In commerce coverage, each international locations use tariffs and tariff-rate quotas (TRQs).

“The extent of entry that Canada presents to its dairy market by way of TRQs is … proportionately a lot greater than the U.S.,” because of excessive accessibility for merchandise like skim milk powder,” stated Mussell.

The 2 international locations are additionally remarkably comparable in how they administer permits and allocate TRQ.

The U.S. has objected to the allocation of dairy import permits by Canada to processors, “however that is what the U.S. does,” Mussell wrote.

He famous Canada allocates dairy import permits proportional to historic imports or output and so does the U.S.

Though the U.S. has complained that Canada doesn’t fill a few of its dairy import quotas, Mussell stated the U.S. leaves a lot of its personal dairy import quotas unfilled.

In the meantime, the U.S. additionally employs coverage measures that distort markets, like pooling of milk income to benefit dairy manufacturing, and non-tariff obstacles referring to Grade A milk merchandise that the U.S . employs and Canada doesn’t.

Mussell additionally famous the essential variations between the 2 international locations’ methods, just like the pricing construction. Canada’s system is primarily based on value of manufacturing. The U.S. pricing construction is extra variable, requiring authorities stabilization program help.

The similarity between the 2 nations’ dairy commerce coverage presents a chance for alignment, Mussell concluded.

The total coverage notice is out there here.